- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
The T14 assault tank was the product of a collaboration between British and American engineers.
In the run-up to the Second World War, there was a general consensus that heavy infantry support tanks would soon be needed on the battlefields. Several powers had already launched production and deployment of heavy tanks, meanwhile British and American tank designers were just getting down to developing a specification for their concept. After a visit by the head of the US Army Ordnance Department to the UK, engineers from both countries began working on a joint project to design a heavy infantry tank. The British were already working on updating their own Churchill tank, while the Americans were putting the finishing touches on their M6 Heavy Tank. However it’s always good to have a backup, and two heads are better than one, right? Engineering resources were pooled and it was decided that T14 prototypes would be housed in the US. Work began in earnest.
In the meantime, the Second World War and recent operational experiences prompted the military to do a top-down review of their requirements for armored vehicles. When two prototypes were built and tested in 1943, it quickly became apparent that the tank design fell short of meeting the army’s needs. Both the British and the Americans succeeded in solving this problem by tweaking their own heavy tanks and were wholly satisfied with the results. The T14’s advantages weren’t enough to warrant interrupting production and modernization programs already underway. Military leaders refused to rethink the concept so close to their important clash with Hitler’s forces in Europe.
Download Wallpaper: 1280x1024 | 1920x1080 | 2560x1440
The T14 never saw any real action. But we’re about to see how it fares on the battlefields of War Thunder! The T14 closely resembles the Sherman – it has a cast turret and a sharply angled front armor plate, as well as the 75 mm M3 cannon favored by players. The powertrain is also similar – 500 hp. Despite being conceived as an assault tank, at the end of testing it turned out that the T14’s armor wouldn’t be sufficient to push it up into the heavy tank class. The hull armor is 50 mm thick all around and the front is composed of two armor plates angled at around 60 degrees. The transmission is protected by 101 mm of plating. The turret armor is comparable to the Sherman – 102 mm on the sides of the cast turret, making it hard to penetrate, while the typically rounded shape guarantees frequent ricochets. The T14 boasts 12.7 mm steel armored plates on the tracks, which handily protects them against shock waves from bombs and rocket shells, while HEAT shells that strike the plates will arm and detonate outside the tank.
The no-nonsense T14 will be a rank II premium vehicle in the US tech tree, joining the earlier Shermans in battle as an excellent addition to your deck in Arcade Battles, and a trump card against enemy air-dropped bombs in RB. Don’t miss the T14 in the next major update in War Thunder, a truly excellent tank!
Previous Development Blogs:
Comments (199)
Why do all new heavies have to be premium? The last time we got a heavy in the regular tree was the super pershing, nearly one year ago... This would've fit perfectly as the first heavy in the US tree!
You know that some Dev Q&A's basicly confirmed the T30, T34 and T29E3 as regular heavy tanks somewhere along the line? ;D
#stopprototypes
#no #theyhavebeenaroundsicnethebagining #hashtag
i love its looks, so modern, so low.. like a lowriding bradley or something xD
Yes plz!. Hope the Britts get 1 to one day. But with the 6pdr gun. And the only thing im missing now is a M7 (T7E2) Medium tank as a prem tank. Armed with the Ordnance QF 6-Pounder And M7 (T7E5) Medium tank in the Tech tree. Armed with the 75mm Gun M3. It also has the less extensive side-skirts.
Ditto. I would love to see the British T14 Assault tank in game.
Lunatic242, yep.
This looks like a lovely addition. However I do wounder if the British equivilant with the ROQF 6 pounder would be added as well which would show off the international design by having both tech trees with the T14 that represents it's history and conception. I do not think it would take that much effort to change the gun out for the 6pdr when it comes to modeling but I do think there is more to it then simply that (if my statement is true I would've expected more Churchill and Cromwell variants)
The British version was A. a completely different vehicle simply designed to the same specifications (A33 Excelsior) and B. Also mounted a 75mm gun.
Comrade_Katya, The British one was A) Designed with the same specifications as the US one as both were intended to fill the same role, and B) Mounted the RO QF 6pdr, WHICH is the one in the Bovington Tank museum right now... physical proof of it's existence if Wikipedia is too sketchy for you for it to be reliable.
Still no new chieftain 😭😭 good looking tank though
Chieftain is already in
Colonel_Hogan2, Mk.5/4, Mk.10, Mk.12... Just like there are two M60, two Leopards and four T-54, we NEED another version... It's the only top tier MBT we have, while other countries have several 8.0 and even 8.3 tanks!
Yes!! I am a happy tanker. thx Gaijin this is one of my favorit tank 10/10
*freedom Intensifies*
why should the premium of its new tank ??, why not in the tech tree of his new tank ??
Maybe because only 2 prototypes were built?
A33 Excelsior, Cromwell on steroids?
Submit a complaint