- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 22.1 GB (Minimal client)
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 62.2 GB (Full client)
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 22.1 GB (Minimal client)
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 62.2 GB (Full client)
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 22.1 GB (Minimal client)
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 62.2 GB (Full client)
In the War Thunder Roadmap for Spring-Summer 2024, we promised to talk about new effects for damaging ground vehicle crews as well as healing them. We also mentioned that these changes will be based on player voting. We’ll being going through our proposals today and would like you to take the survey — let’s jump in!
Additional effects on vehicles when armor is penetrated
Most of us have experienced situations where penetrating lightly armored IFVs and APCs with large empty areas causes the shell and its fragments not to destroy or disable any crew or modules. This could also happen to tanks that are penetrated by shells with a narrow damage zone as well. When this happens, the shell and its fragments pass close to crew members and modules and sometimes even hits them, but is usually not enough to cause sufficient damage to stop the enemy from being able to fire back, at least for a short time.
We understand that this can be frustrating for the player who fired the shot, as from their point of view they did everything right. The enemy vehicle was hit, perhaps even close to vital modules, but they were subsequently unlucky.
We’re proposing three ways to solve this problem and plan to implement them in parallel. Let’s take a look at them.

The first way is to introduce a more detailed damage model to specific vehicles. There’ll be new types of modules, ranging from electronic modules for air defense vehicles, machine gun ammunition, electrical equipment, as well as detailing and correcting guidance modules such as the drives. This is labor intensive and painstaking work however, as it cannot be implemented for all ground vehicles in the game at once — each vehicle would require separate manual work. In particular as part of this task, we’re currently separating and detailing the elevation and traverse drives of the M1 and Leopard 2 series tanks with the addition of a hydraulic drive supply tank, where disabling this part will also disable the guidance drive.
The second way is to introduce new logic for damaging crew members and modules, which will reduce the likelihood of the situations we’ve described above, as hits will be effective even in these cases. Here’s how it’ll work. Any hit to a crew member causes a stun effect. When stunned, the camera will shake and sparks will be shown on your screen for a short period of time, about 1-2 seconds. Dealing damage to the gunner (or commander in vehicles with duplicate controls) causes a few seconds of concussion. It also causes the camera to shake, a ringing effect in your ears, and a temporary drift with a variable vector (a change in direction) is added to the gun aiming, which you’ll need to compensate for manually. In this case the initial aiming point when armor is penetrated moves away at the moment of receiving damage (taking into account the favor killer mechanics) to a random distance and direction within approximately 1/4 of the screen.
The third way is additional sources of fire in the fighting compartment, where damage to internal modules in this area may cause them to start an internal fire. Several things can burn and smolder inside a vehicle: crew clothing, wiring, machine gun ammo, plus rubbish and oil on the floor. In this case the fire can go out on its own, unlike an engine or fuel tank fire, and the damage it causes will be less than the damage caused by an engine or fuel fire.
Healing of wounded ground crew members

Due to numerous requests, we’re also considering the possibility of introducing healing for injured ground crew members. How do crew injuries currently affect gameplay? When calculating the repair time, active crew members that have been skilled are taken into account (knocked out crew are considered not skilled). The percentage of remaining health is linearly converted into a repair time multiplier in the range from 0.5 to 1. The average value is calculated for the entire crew in the vehicle.
For calculating reload time, only loaders are used. In their case, the percentage of health is converted into a reload time multiplier from 1 to 1.25. A loader who has taken maximum possible damage but is still conscious has a reload penalty with a parameter value of x1.25 from the normal reload time. If they’re knocked out, the penalty increases to 2x. If there’s several loaders, the average value for all of them is calculated. For conscious crew members, skilled crews are taken into account.
We want to go with the simplest and easiest-to-use implementation for the healing of wounded ground crew members: the automatic healing of the crew. If the crew does not receive any damage within a given time, their health is restored to the minimum level required to remove most of the penalty for the crew to perform their duties. If any damage is received during the healing process, it stops and the countdown to the start of the healing process starts from the beginning.

Take the survey!
We’ve created a survey with a few yes or no questions that you can take. Be sure to complete it and submit it to us!
Please note that the survey will be available until April 19th 13:00 GMT.

Comments (175)
Comments will be premoderatedPlease use this forum thread if you want to leave detailed suggestion and/or discuss this article: https://forum.warthunder.com/t/following-the-roadmap-possible-changes-to-ground-vehicle-damage-models/98214 Thanks!
Don't forget to pariticpate in survey! (you need to be logged in)
I hope the stun effect will rather just be dependent on damage of crewmembers like If the gunner is damaged within the scope the view will be bloodshot and have vignetting and the third person view the same what happened if the command is damaged In the same for the drivers view, which would mean people could actually have a use for it for having a clear view But I dislike The concept of a concussive and stunning effect for initial damage
What about replenishing ammo and crew on spawn rather than healing crew like in CoD. Something like field base which could be also a spawn. Having replenishment point on the battlefield inside combat zone is the wierdest thing and i've never saw that in any combat/fps/strategy game
Stop giving your players to vote when they have 0 idea what they voting for just remove voting
Milen_ProHunter, If you will read the article, you will know what are you voting on.
Increasing the detail within the tank like "the first way" describes sounds great but, the part about doing it a few at the time worries me as this could nerf vehicles for a while if only they get it in their br bracket. Maybe deal with this by doing groups of similar vehicles all at once like patch x all toptier mbt's get it another patch ww2 heavies, etc
These are all really cool and fairly good ideas however id say it wouldn't hurt to put in an event sort of thing to test it on the playerbase like what was done with bvr missiles
This is the first time I've ever seen a blog here that feels like it could undermine what makes War Thunder special compared to world of tanks. The largest issue I've seen people complain about was always inconsistent damage to modules of specific tanks in specific nations at high tier. The answer isn't to just consistently increase the survivability of tanks through an arcadey hit points system, or to make specific vehicles handheld with further inconsisent spall liners. Terrible Direction.
a short stun that depends on how wounded a crew member is sounds like a better idea than a pure stun. For example the loader pausing the reload for a second (not resseting it) the gunner's sight behing blinded (seeing double or a huge vignette effect maybe ?) if he gets wonded for a second, the driver could lose control of the vehicle and hit the brakes or slightly turn to one side. but it HAS to be based on how injured the crew member is, a slight scratch is very different from losing a limb
Please stop giving voting rights to wt community 😭
I would agree to all of these mechanics if they were exclusive to the problem vehicles that do not take enough damage, such as wheeled vehicles and Lightly Armored vehicles. Otherwise, I think this is a step in the wrong direction.
Adding more firesources Only makes sense if we get to replenish extinguishers on caps
Submit a complaint