System Requirements
- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
Minimum
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
Recommended
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Minimum
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
Recommended
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Minimum
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
Recommended
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
War Thunder. Abrams vs.T-72A
Attention! Outdated news format. Content may not display correctly.
It’s been a while since we had a proper comparison on the channel. Today we restore this great tradition with a stand-off between two legendary heavies: the Soviet T-72A and the American M1 Abrams.
The War Thunder Team
Read more:
Comments (62)
whoa a nice devblog....
and yes ofc the T80's better because it had the help of gaijin, with their marvelous "balancing" acts. that makes every western tank a pile of burning garbage.
laughs in type 90 being litteraly the best tank in game laughs in amx40 super apfsds shell laughs in leopard 2a4 good at everything laughs in us 70% winrate in sim
also all western tanks bar a few (amx40) have around 1.5 times less reload than the russian tanks which makes them able to follow up shots alot faster
Yea, everyone knows that the Abrams has an Autoloade- wait
1-M1 Abrams is able to penetrate T72 and T80 if it had its proper ammo (M833 DU with its 247mm pen at *60) IT WOULD EAT THEM AS SNACKS* 2-Still T80 is a smaller target thus making it better for any engagement more than 800m 3-M1 abrams turret ring is a joke on game even a BT-5 can kill an abrams, give its actual 244-350mm and fix the Rep cost, we don't have any fancy systems like infrared or anything to cost so much 4-And for the sake of realism please FIX the 1 Pixel Diameter of shells in game
even if shells were bigger in 90% of siturations it wouldnt matter as the apfsds round would still pen or just bounce into the ufp of the abrams or under the turret up into the turret m1 turret ring is actually realistic it only gets upgraded on the m1a1 the m833 as far as i know still cant pen the t80 or t72A hull armor and can only pen their weakspots due to the t72A with 16mm plate and t80 with 30mm plate having too much armor to be penned
I can hear the Ameraboos crying....
So, does this mean that the Abrams will be 9,3 like the T72 now? Does this mean the IPM1 will be 9,3 since it has the same ammo and mobility as the Abrams? Does this mean that Germany and America can fight on the same side again but USSR can not fight on the same side as the Germans? Does this mean that the OF40 will be 9,3 now since it has about the same mobility and penetration as the Abrams does?
t72 has far far worse mobility and its reload is worse in addition to this its chemical armor is non existant compared to m1ip with the stupid 1000-1300mm chemical armor which is clearly overperforming as its only 900mm los thickness
Wait, since when did the Abrams have an auto loader?
who in their right mind would compare these 2 vehicles? the T72A is vastly out of date especialy with the amo it caries, the abrams wrecks it every day, as soon as we get the M1A1 this is a Irak War scenario at least 20 year out of date tanks and 30 years out of date amo against the newest shit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QwnVRslntU8
T72B wen ?
Submit a complaint