- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Dear players,
Another round of questions and answers, with War Thunder producer Vyacheslav Bulannikov!
Q. What is the progress of the work around helicopters?
We still continue with the tests. Moreover we have found a minimum of 2 suitable vehicles for each nation (in some cases up to 4 vehicles) including Italy and France which can fit into our project.
Q. What about the IS-7?
Perhaps it will appear and if it does it could happen this year.
Q. Is it true that there are some plans to remove the Panther II and King Tiger 10.5cm ?
Such plans have been considered for a long time, but there are no final decisions made about them. The fact is that these vehicles were included in the early stages of the game and it was necessary during this time. But there are a lot of complaints about the “realistic” components. And now we have some other vehicles to replace them. In any case if we do decide to remove them they will simply be hidden on the research tree but will remain for players who already own them.
Q.What changes will be done on Abrams and how will we deal with it in the Т-64?
There will be a finalization of the "spall liner" (inside the vehicle). For example if it will be penetrated by a shot, this will not help and save the crew from a fire. Also it will not be possible to extinguish ammunition until it burns itself out so the entire stored area of ammunition will be destroyed so any usable ammunition will come from the hull. At the time of the ammunition fire, the turret needs to be rotated away from the engine (as in reality) to preserve the powerplant and transmission until the ammunition fire has completely gone out. In addition the T-64B will receive a researchable modification to the T-64BV.
Q. What was your impression regarding the April Fools' submarines?
In general everything was fine, although after a while i think some moments could be improved. But considering that this event made in the shortest time it was a success. And statistics show that it was played by more players than last years event.
Q. Can you tell us something about the nearest plans?
We are working on the new major update which hopefully should be completed in May. I can tell you that a new modification of the T-62 is planned.
Q. Any new information about fleet? Someone mentioned anti ship missiles.
I don’t want to say anything new at the moment - the tests continue. We hope that it will be possible to make fleet testing on regular basis with additional research. It is to early for now to speak about anti-ship missiles, there are many difficulties like minimum range, the features of shooting beyond the horizon and ways to counter them.
Q. What do you think about the opinion of the players about the excessive efficiency and imbalance of the P-47 series and "imbalance" to their closest rivals?
Recently, the "Thunderbolts" received a higher BR. There has been little time to evaluate the result right now and we need to look further at the statistics and check everything. At the moment we are discussing a possible option involving starting from the airfield.
Q. Regarding the BRs of the T-55 and Leopard A1A1. The Т-55 doesn’t have any special advantages but the BR is significantly different.
There is no solution for this vehicle at the moment. According to statistics the tank has average performance. In addition there will always be some difference in capabilities and vehicle BR because different vehicles are made for different tasks and situations.
Comments (134)
How long until aircraft cockpits are finished?
Most of them are finished.
Stona_WT, does that include proper bomber cockpits? not the temporary ones currently in game as in proper ones on par with fighter cockpits. I remember years ago talk of a B-24 cockpit in the works but haven't heard much on the topic of bomber cockpits since other than the addition of the current really basic ones.
so no plans to fix dm13 apfsds
Would it be possible for future tanks or aircraft to increase the maximum battle rating to e.g 10.3 or higher?
I hope the Challenger get some love,same as the French and Japan whit a Buff or new Toys to play with. For example the Churchill AVRE as new Premium,The Heavy line for Japan and the French to top off whit a sprinkle Buff.
You should rework the rocket flames and models of ATGMs and make it possible to go into the rockts/missiles view as a spectator and in replays. And not add the BIAS-7
Got a feeling that IS-7 is gonna be premium and everyone is gonna buy it... other nation get rekted 24/7
ACH-47A dai banana !
I think the Panther II should not be removed but instead made more historically accurate, which is incredibly simple, you just need to copy the hull found in the Patton Museum (no sideskirts), then instead of the Panther Ausf.G turret the Americans wrongly installed switch for a Schmalturm and give it the 88mm Kwk43 as the main gun (the same turret and gun of the current Panther II), the NV equipment should be removed and installed in one of the later production Panthers
I honestly cannot understand the question about the P-47, I mean, it says the P-47 series is imbalanced but it's wrong, the only P-47's that are imbalanced are the premium ones because they have a lower BR than the non-premiums and also because they benefit from air-spawn, in my opinion the non-premium P-47's should get their old BR back because the problem are the premiums that outclimb the opposition, if you remove their air-spawn they become balanced
So about the whole Tiger II 10.5 and Panther II thing: "And now we have some other vehicles to replace them." I get that people who already own them will keep them, but will we get the "replacement" tanks without having to research them? The issue with these tanks is not necessarily that they are so paper they need to be removed, but they are not as competitive as the other tanks they face. I just hope the replacements will be provided free/hasve less of a grind. Not trying to be sound entitled.
When are you going to lower the repair price for the new tanks? They are ridiculously high.
Submit a complaint