- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Dear players,
Another round of questions and answers, with War Thunder producer Vyacheslav Bulannikov!
Q. What is the progress of the work around helicopters?
We still continue with the tests. Moreover we have found a minimum of 2 suitable vehicles for each nation (in some cases up to 4 vehicles) including Italy and France which can fit into our project.
Q. What about the IS-7?
Perhaps it will appear and if it does it could happen this year.
Q. Is it true that there are some plans to remove the Panther II and King Tiger 10.5cm ?
Such plans have been considered for a long time, but there are no final decisions made about them. The fact is that these vehicles were included in the early stages of the game and it was necessary during this time. But there are a lot of complaints about the “realistic” components. And now we have some other vehicles to replace them. In any case if we do decide to remove them they will simply be hidden on the research tree but will remain for players who already own them.
Q.What changes will be done on Abrams and how will we deal with it in the Т-64?
There will be a finalization of the "spall liner" (inside the vehicle). For example if it will be penetrated by a shot, this will not help and save the crew from a fire. Also it will not be possible to extinguish ammunition until it burns itself out so the entire stored area of ammunition will be destroyed so any usable ammunition will come from the hull. At the time of the ammunition fire, the turret needs to be rotated away from the engine (as in reality) to preserve the powerplant and transmission until the ammunition fire has completely gone out. In addition the T-64B will receive a researchable modification to the T-64BV.
Q. What was your impression regarding the April Fools' submarines?
In general everything was fine, although after a while i think some moments could be improved. But considering that this event made in the shortest time it was a success. And statistics show that it was played by more players than last years event.
Q. Can you tell us something about the nearest plans?
We are working on the new major update which hopefully should be completed in May. I can tell you that a new modification of the T-62 is planned.
Q. Any new information about fleet? Someone mentioned anti ship missiles.
I don’t want to say anything new at the moment - the tests continue. We hope that it will be possible to make fleet testing on regular basis with additional research. It is to early for now to speak about anti-ship missiles, there are many difficulties like minimum range, the features of shooting beyond the horizon and ways to counter them.
Q. What do you think about the opinion of the players about the excessive efficiency and imbalance of the P-47 series and "imbalance" to their closest rivals?
Recently, the "Thunderbolts" received a higher BR. There has been little time to evaluate the result right now and we need to look further at the statistics and check everything. At the moment we are discussing a possible option involving starting from the airfield.
Q. Regarding the BRs of the T-55 and Leopard A1A1. The Т-55 doesn’t have any special advantages but the BR is significantly different.
There is no solution for this vehicle at the moment. According to statistics the tank has average performance. In addition there will always be some difference in capabilities and vehicle BR because different vehicles are made for different tasks and situations.
Comments (134)
Are there any plans to increase the APDS penetration of guns like the 17 Pounder, 20 Pounder and 120mm L1 based on the bug reports previously submitted?
I'd like to add the 105 mm L7A3 to that list.
SwordoftheStars, forgot about the L7A1 and A3 and (and M68 by extension) but yeah need fixing too.
How about lowering the Type 74's BR to at least 8.3 or 8.0 like LeoA1A1 and T-62 ?!?! No kidding that thing is over-tiered and the APFSDS is outdated against literally all modern MBTs you added recently!!! Also everytime i touched this thing and i always found myself fighting Challenger, T-64 or Abrams, it's unplayable and very rare that i can become a top tier! Also Japan only has one 8.7 so when i die i don't have other vehicle for this tier but STB and that thing is 7.7 without APFSDS, sigh..
You had your chance to voice your BR suggestions in thread we created some time ago to gather feedback after latest BR changes.
MartyBadger, "Suggestion" that is a place what the dev never see....
*cries in Japanese*
well not the first time.....................
A Shamefur Dispray!
Will you finally lower BR spread to 0.7 from 1.0 or at least make T-54 8.0? Because it's impossible to play 6.7 now. 7/10 im ending with T-54 + 7.7 impenetrable tanks.
They should lower the spread to 0.3 . I know that this would be increase the queue first, but when ppl realise the mm is ballanced, more ppl would play again which would decrease it again. BR compression is a mistake.
Schwuppdich, So what about the queue time. people should just get a little more patient and have a more fair play. that +1 - br is the main problem with this games.
Great questions this time around. and good answers. thank you kindly for taking the time to communicate with the community. have a pleasant day.
Will you be adding any British Light tanks please? Like the Scorpion 90? I've been anticipating this and seems like no sign of it.
I've been waiting for the Scorpion as well, I'd like to see the Scimitar or Warrior as well
what about East German tanks ??
You mean Russian tanks?
Dalriaden, Correctly pronounced as "Soviet"
Challenger 1 current issues. - turret armour still so buggy that leopard a1a1 apdsfs can pen it at 500m. - they still haven't renamed it Challenger 1. - turret sides armour values are wrong. - the turret armour values needs to be uppen to 500mm against kinetic and 850mm against chemical at lest. - L23A1 APDSFS is still missing 50mm pen. - L23A1 APDSFS round price is also still very high needs to go down in price. - L15A5 APDS missing 28mm pen. - L31A7 HESH is m...
Are there any plans to introduce a light tank tree for Britain, e.g - Scimitar, Scorpion, Warrior? Thanks
How about FPE for aircraft that had it>
This is actually a good idea.
Submit a complaint