- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Dear players,
Another round of questions and answers, with War Thunder producer Vyacheslav Bulannikov!
Planes
Q: Do you have any plans to split the Ki-200 into the Army and Navy versions to expand the Japanese 8.0 Lineup? The Ki-200 currently has skins for both the J8M and Ki-200. All that is needed is the aircraft's cannons to be changed. The model is correct for both. The Army Ki-200 has Type 5 30mm cannons whilst the Navy J8M has Ho-105 30mm cannons. This would really help grow the Japanese rank 5 with little work needed.
A: We have doubts about the need for such an extension of the Japanese aircraft tree for the 5th rank. In update 1.75 we added the more interesting Saber F40 version and we find it more interesting.
Q: What will happen to the DB.7 and D.521 premiums in the British tree? Will we see them in the French tree soon? What of the Hawk 75 (French P-36) that was found within the CDK?
A: DB-7 is not an exception. About Hawks - in the update 1.75 we have added two variants Hawk 75-H-75A-1 and H-75A-4.
Q: Has there been any changes to the decision regarding the Sturmtiger? Larger calibre SPGs are really popular and fun! Perhaps a Rank V premium,or event gift?
A: Probably only as a collector’s vehicle, like it was with BM-13, which means that there won’t be any guarantees of effectiveness in battles. There are no specific plans, but it will probably appear for some future event.
Q: Italians are currently lacking premium aircraft right now, are there any in the works?
A: Yes, there are several models in preparation, but we can not say which will be first.
Q: Do you have any intention to include the missing early Seafire variants? There is a gap in between the Sea Hurricanes and Firefly/Firebrand where the Merlin powered Seafire Mk I, Mk II and Mkiii could easily fit. Also the Griffon powered Seafire XV. Perhaps these could be included in the French tree later with the Aéronavale line or premiums?
A: Yes, we have such plans (regarding early Seafires).
Q: Most nations now have very capable SPAAG’s at 8.0 now. Britain still has the Falcon, which does not compare greatly to the Type 87, Gepard, Shilka and M163. Now that we have Rank VI and more expansion in Rank V, are the Chieftain Sabre or Chieftain Marksman SPAAGs possible now?
A: Yes, it is not excluded. These SPAAGs are being considered to be added to the game.
Q: Do you have any options to expand the aircraft ranges for the top rank? Currently ground forces pushes into the 1960s and 1970s, however aircraft still remain in the 1950s. Is it possible we could see unguided missile later aircraft like the Gloster Javelin, A-4 Skyhawk, Later MiG-17s, FIAT G.91 R/3 or G.91Y, F-86H, Hunter F.6? This could also open up the possibility to include new bombers like the Tu-95, Vulcan, Victor, Valiant and B-52?
A: Yes, we believe that there are such opportunities, even if it is not about aircraft with missile weapons, so we can make attacker aircraft.
Q: Now that we have the SM.81, is it possible we can now see the bomber modification of the German Ju-52 Tante Ju as a 1.3 aircraft or premium/gift? It could carry up to 500kg (1100lb) of bombs as well as having defensive armament. The aircraft is very similar in characteristics to the SM.81 and would be a very popular event/gift/premium machine.
A: Unlike the specialized SM.81, which can carry up to 2 tons of bombs, the Yu-52 is primarily a transport aircraft with weak flight characteristics and we don’t consider it necessary to add it to the research tree, it may be possible as a collector's vehicle.
Q: Now that the B-24 has received a new model, is it possible we will see additional variants? In addition, is a British Fleet Air Arm premium Corsair modification possible now they also have new models?
A: In update 1.75 we added the British Corsair Mk.2. Regarding the B-24 - we don’t have any plans for any other modifications of it at the moment.
Q: Can you give us any hints as to which aircraft will receive new models/variants in the future? Perhaps the Spitfire Mk V series, Bf 110, P-40, Blenheim or Mosquito? All of these aircraft have many different modifications available and could do with reworked existing models.
A: Spitfire V is now in the process of creating an updated model, and we have plans for the P-40 and 110 series
Q: Will the factory modifications of U5 and U6 be added for Bf 109 G6-G14? I would especially like to try the MK-103 on the 109th. And will there be a modification of the Il-28Sh and MiG-9 with a 57mm gun in the game?
A: As far as I know, there is something in the plans and I recently received documentation from historians on this topic.
Q: Is it possible for an aircraft such as the Ki-91 to appear in the game as a response to the top heavy bombers of other countries? It was existing, but did not have time to fly.
A: As far as we know, in reality this aircraft did not exist, the aerodynamic models were wind tunnel only, so there are no plans for this aircraft.
Q: Is it possible, including on the eve of the fleet, to introduce late Japanese torpedoes, namely the versions of the Type 91 torpedo with a larger mass of the warhead? In the current reality, Japanese torpedoes are the weakest in the game, and there are no alternatives in the form of bombs, in view of the small load, unlike to the bombers of other countries.
A: Yes, we are thinking of the Type-4 oxygen torpedoes for B7A2 and P1Y.
Q: Is it planned to implement the T-64A with a gas turbine engine? For example, as premium on the 6th rank. The tank existed in reality and even passed testing phase. Actually, this is a prototype of the T-80.
A: As with the vehicles of the 30s and 50s, first of all we introduce more mass and well-known machines, and after that different prototypes and objects. Primarily, we would like to add mass produced versions of the T-72 and T-80 families, and only then their rarer versions.
Sound
Q: Which new sound effects are in the plans?
A: Now we have begun to deal with reworking the sounds of weapons, in particular, machine guns, then we will turn to cannons. Processing is primarily for the purpose of atmospheric sounding at different distances. There will also be a change in the sound of tank engines depending on the position of the camera (as now it happens with the sounds of aircraft engines for example). We can not say anything about ETA at the moment. The work is voluminous, most likely, it will all come out in a parts, from patch to patch.
Q: What about the sounds of French tanks, have you managed to copy from real vehicles?
A: Yes, those tanks that survived and with authentic engines, we have recorded. This applies to the rest of the tanks in the game. By recording the tanks, large-scale work was done. Despite the fact that there are not so many vehicles with authentic running engines - we and our team managed to record a large number of aircraft and tanks. Some of them are in a individual.
Q: Are there any third-party sound libraries used for sound in ground vehicles?
A: No, if we are talking about the sound of engines, we have a very rich own database of "live" recordings. If it is needed to synthesize a sound, we use it. But the more difficult to get sounds, for example, hits, some shots (some, because we have also written some of the tools available from reality). Then yes, we can use other libraries.
Q: Will there be new soundtracks?
A: Yes, recently we recorded some new music, after the new year they should appear.
Q: Will the work continue in the direction of the national voice, meaning the general commands, for example "attack point A".
A: Yes, with regard to voice acting, some work is under way in this direction. The national voice-over is of course needed and we will definitely develop it.
You can ask your question to the developers on our official forum in the "Questions to the Team" section.
Comments (127)
Did i just read T-72 will be added ?
Essentialy it's gonna be T64 just without the flaps and overal more sexy.
Sounds like it, and the T-80 as well. We definitely need more top tier tanks to flesh out 9.0, because right now it's pretty awful.
Will you ever add the Skink SPAA for the USA/British (it was Canadian)?
yes we need this it would be awesome
British.
Yeah no, sturmtiger should be available for every player in the regular tree, not this 'once in a millennia for sitting in front of the screen 10 hours a day, or for a large sum of money, or just for top 500 *censored*s who were being zombies in an event.'
" for top 500 *censored*s who were being zombies in an event" ... That pretty much describes those who got the E100 pretty well. Haha Yea, I do tatally agree with your point. Let´s take myselfe for example: I do have a job and I have to go to University ... Well, not much free time for me to spend there, but I got the money ;)
Tournament no but event yes. No offense but if it was in the main tree it would be utterly useless and unbalancable. The main tree meme tanks such as the kv2 are actually useful. The sturmtiger would have to have the most insane reload. Even if reloads in wt aren't realistic. An event like the bm13 one would be fine as it wasn't that hard.
Regarding early generation missiles development, how is it going? The missiles used on second generation (and some third generation) jet aircraft were highly unreliable as they lacked range and accuracy which would not make them "Fire-And-Forget" missiles; some EARLY supersonic aircraft such as the MiG-19S and MiG-21F did not carry missiles and had to rely on cannons. According to this book "Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War" early missiles had an accuracy of no more than 30%!
Give my a Phantom :D
It will happen eventually, probably with an April Fools event first so Gaijin can 'test the water' and see what the community thinks.
Q: Any plans on adding the Me 262 HG1, HG2 in the near future?
With the AEC AC Mk II being an event vehicle, is it likely that Britain will receive the Mk I (Valentine turret, 2 Pounder gun) and the Mk III (Mk II turret with 75mm gun) as regular vehicles? The latter was probably the most recognisable of the AEC AC series.
Britain? Scout tanks? Don't you know that's illegal?
I keep waiting on the fastback variant's to the P-51 B/C(hopefully with a Malcom hood upgrade) and the P-47 B/C/D some of the most significant American Aces only flew those versions (Robert S Johnson , Don Gentle) due to the American practice of rotating pilots out of theater to train new pilots.
Is there any chance that you will implement a post-war ground attacker for Germany in the near future? Even if it is not better than the Do-217 or the Arado it would be nice to have a (non-fighter-)post-war vehicle for RB groundforces.
Are there any plans to add more Leopards into the German tech tree? for example the 1A4 or 1A3, or maybe even the Canadian modifications like the C1? If not, do you at least plan to add APFSDS for the Leo A1A1? i just feel like the Leopards need some love
Are there any chance to see new MBTs on Japanese tank tree? eg. variations of STA, STB, Type 74, or Type 90.
Submit a complaint