- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
We’ve seen a lot of topics regarding the armor of the Abrams series of tanks, more specifically the presence of DU (depleted uranium) armor, and so we’d like to share our data on the subject.
Most sources on radiation safety clarify that the only threat to personnel is posed from armor packages in the cheeks of the turret. The M1A2 Abrams in War Thunder has uranium armor in the turret cheeks.
We’re aware that several experimental vehicles of an unspecified modification of the Abrams were equipped with reinforced DU armor in the hull. However, even though armor was reinforced on these experimental variants, we have no sources that clarify which specific versions of the Abrams these were, and as such can’t confidently state that any of the Abrams versions we have in War Thunder received this specific hull armor reinforcement.
The documents presented in the reports we currently have don’t provide clear evidence of DU armor being present on the M1A2 SEP V1 or M1A2 SEP V2 modifications. A significant increase in mass which would accompany strengthening the armor with high-density fillers is also not observed in the SEP V1 or SEP V2 versions.
Additionally, a significant weight increase from such an armor package would lead to overloading the first pair of torsion bars, which already are under an increased load on the M1 series due to the placement of the frontal armor being positioned significantly far towards the front of the hull, as well as the large armored fuel tanks either side of the driver.
The implementation of low-density mass-efficient fillers would inevitably require an increase in size, which is not observed on the serial modifications of the M1 Abrams.
We’d also like to leave a comment on the sources that players cite as evidence about the use of depleted uranium for the M1A2 SEP.
Боевые машины Уралвагонзавода. Танк Т-72 (Combat vehicles of Uralvagonzavod. Tank T-72)
This book cannot be considered a reliable source, especially for modern Western vehicles. The authors wrote this book shortly after the SEP came into service, the written information is more speculation and guesses on their part. This book also contains errors for the characteristics of Soviet tanks in comparison to other open source data available.
MATERIALS LICENSE from U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Licenses to work with depleted uranium in the hull of the M1 Abrams series of tanks may apply to those experimental vehicles, for example 5 vehicles located at the tank school. These documents do not describe whether there was depleted uranium in a particular modification of the tank.
M1 Abrams Main Battle Tank, Owners' Workshop Manual
This publication does not directly indicate that the M1A2 SEP or M1A2 SEP V2 had depleted uranium armor added to the hull. Only general words that the changes achieved on the M1A1SA were implemented on the M1A2 SEP V2. In addition, this source is secondary; other independent secondary sources are also needed.
The Army's Future Combat Systems Program and Alternatives
Only the use of third-generation uranium armor is mentioned, but there’s no confirmation that this armor was located in the body of the M1A2 SEP, and what exactly the “third generation” consisted of.
If we consider other projections, possible changes to the armor of the Abrams over its various modifications may not have directly resulted in an increase in the actual protection of the armor itself. These changes could rather have been aimed at increasing the armor filler’s survivability upon impact (which is an element not currently modeled in the game). Because of this, without hard numbers and solid facts confirming a tangible increase in protection, we can’t alter the protection currently offered by the armor on the M1 series.
However, this is not the end of our attention on the Abrams, as we’ll continue to look at all declassified and publicly available information we can regarding its protection — we fully appreciate the discussion. If in the future an increase in protection can be validated and corroborated from available sources, we’ll take action on it.
Thank you to everyone in our community for your attention on this topic and for all of the discussions you’ve brought forward, we hope that this devblog has managed to provide useful information and clarify our outlook on the Abrams currently.
Comments (22)
Comments will be premoderatedThe fact that 5 hulls were built with DU is enough to put them on any of the Abrams from the M1A1 HC and Beyond. I worked the Abrams program and there is plenty of unclassified documents that show this to be the case. You are arbitrarily preventing the use of it in any of those vehicles. That is to say, your logic is flawed with a further understanding of how the Abrams program works.
Conte_Baracca, Post the public information the details that then?
Conte_Baracca, ''I worked the Abrams program''. Oh how bloody convenient eh???
Hey guys, with sources suggesting DU inserts were present in different models than in-game, and things currently in-game (such as the YAK 141's radar, or the T-80BVM's thermals, TKX (P), etc.) being present that were only either theoretical, or very limited in real-life implementation, would the devs potentially look at developing a M1A2 SEP V2 (P) or similar that may give the US the armor upgrades, without necessarily relying on exact-to-service-record disputes?
Do you ever consider the possibility of adding one of these 'experimental' variants with DU fitted as either a separate vehicle or a 'M1A2 [P]' modification - similar to the Ariete's 'war kit'? Especially as the M1A1 KVT was fudged to be an M1 in-game for balancing, which means you could also make this experimental DU kit/vehicle whatever Abrams variant you want, as you've already been there, done that.
While I do not agree with the reached conclusion, I must praise the effort put towards the transparency of the decision making process on Gaijins behalf, and I gope we can look forward to such devblogs in the future.
It's a shame that members of this community are now threatening to review bomb Gaijin again because Gaijin simply do not have the sources needed to appropriately model the Abrams. Threatening others to force the results you want despite lack of real world evidence for the claims reeks of bias in that they want their Abrams to dominate regardless of any historical accuracy.
Then give the Abrams a new projectile capable of penetrating the hulls of T-90M and T-80BVM in the forehead. Then it will be fair. Because a 5 second reload for Abrams is nonsense. It will not help when you naturally cannot penetrate Soviet MBTs head-on at close range, not to mention long distances, and they kill you with one shot without aiming at the forehead of the hull, even from a distance of 1.5 - 2 km.
This transparency is nice, but there's no pleasing US mains, Gaijin. They will nitpick all the words used here and find new things to complain about.
I really like and appreciate the way you guys communicate with us about these topics. This transparency is great. Keep up the good work :)
Will any of the Abrams get a spall liner?
Well atleast give now the M829A3 or the A4 to be fair with current more powerful armor with Russian and European tanks
Submit a complaint