why doesn't anybody mention the CRITICAL ELEMENT of the caern? Tea will be served shortly after a light lunch, don't be late. Brits love to reminisce and share war stories over tea...in fact, it's their principal reason for having wars to begin with...but they couldn't have such engaging tea time chats without the help of their buddies the Germans, if there were no bad guys to have the wars with, what an empty meaningless time Tea would be? right?

I looked at the title and thought it was the Russian T-34, lol, which would not be very fair XD

E 100 Vs the Sad maus

i feel like the Caernarvon wins even more then they said in the video as they forgot to mention the use of first generation sabot for the Caernarvon that boast a 1400m/s velocity and a 218mm pen at 1500 meaters, so there is not much contest here, the tiger 105 is more of a balance vs the t34.

I haven't reached BR 6.7 yet, but have had BR 5.7 and BR 6.3 tanks face the Caernarvon, and the result for me was always negative.

Personally i like both,i think the reload rate wins it for me on the caernarvon. If this tank was a prototype leading to the conqueror to specifically combat the is3 why when i use caernarvon and conqueror tanks am i always put up against world war 2 tanks? And that's why i don't play them very much. Surely a little bit of realism in matchmaking would go a long way (or scrap and re do the br system).

AP AP AP

The Caernarvon has armour behind the gun-shield... uh. From what I've seen it doesn't. Otherwise its own AP wouldn't be able to go through it. Which it currently can.

Muhh british sabot

I'd just like to add that the Caernarvon's APDS isn't really worth using as a main shell due to lack of damage, something that the T34's AP dishes out in ridiculous quantities.