[Development] We answer your questions! (11 - Page) ) - News

News

We answer your questions!

Attention! Outdated news format. Content may not display correctly.

2 February 2017 Development

Hi, soldiers!
Welcome to the Developer Q&A section, in which we’re going to publish our most exciting development plans and explanations about how the game mechanics work. Simply and concisely.

Read more in the Feedback and Developer Answers Compilation sections on our official forum.

Aircraft

Are there any plans for new top aircraft for Japan such as the J8M (Navy version of Ki-200), P-2J Neptune or the Mitsubishi F-86F-40 Sabre variant?

Not within the next patch. Later, it is possible that we may add some of these aircraft.

What do you think, does it make sense to limit the dive speed of aircraft in AB with flutter speed? It’s just that a Yak-3 diving at 800+ or a Cobra at around 1,000 km/h kind of sucks.

It already works how you described in AB, the aircraft’s speed in a dive is limited by its maximum indicated airspeed, at which in RB the aircraft is destroyed. For the Yak-3 this is around 720 km/h indicated, while the true speed might be closer to 900 km/h.

Ground vehicles

Is there a change or increase planned for the ‘assortment’ of aircraft for tank AB? Particularly for fighters and bombers.

Yes, we have plans for this. I don’t think you’ll have to wait very long.

Are there plans to continue supporting expanding the Japanese Ground Forces tree with new machines in the future after the CBT has concluded? Such as ST-A3 and ST-A4, Heavy tanks (O-I Family), Armoured cars, ATGMs, SPAAG and perhaps more Premiums?

Yes, we plan to expand the current tree for Japanese ground forces, primarily the addition of ATGM’s, which are missing in Japan, and of course, a top SPAAG.

Are you considering the possibility of adding a SPAAG based on the BTR-152 in the 5.0-7.3 BR range? (The USSR has a severe lack of anti-air vehicles there, especially rapid-firing ones capable of effectively shooting down agile fighters)

We have plans for a SPAAG based on the BTR-152, but I don’t think it will be at such a high BR.

Why are many vehicles in the game ‘balanced’ based on whether they have APCR shells? You yourselves know that the presence of APCRs provides the vehicle a disservice: they provide a minimum advantage in terms of ammunition assortment, which becomes a reason for an unjust increase in BR.

That isn’t always the case. For many tanks, APCRs provide a significant increase in their ability to knock out targets that were previously invulnerable to them.

How soon will the Pz.Bfw.VI (P)’s battle rating be reduced in Realistic Battles? Many topics and suggestions have been created about this. Many reviewers that work with Gaijin have spoken NEGATIVELY about this vehicle, and with each new patch the situation for the Tiger only worsens, as the number of vehicles of other nations that end up in the 6.3-7.0 BR range is growing FAR more actively than the number for the 5.0-6.0 range. Porsche’s lead Tiger is poor and getting even worse – so why hasn’t its BR been changed?

It’s possible that this will be changed during the next BR change and economy recalculation.

There is a Type 60 SPRR. This SPG has two configurations – marching and battle. Will the marching configuration be implemented? It can still fire in this configuration, incidentally.

We don’t currently have plans for this.

Will there be any changes to the repair mechanics? It looks frankly absurd when damage dealt by a high-caliber 122 mm cannon is repaired more quickly than the cannon reloads. Especially in Simulator Battles.

We arrived at the current repair speeds, including for SB, based on the results of reviews in part from players themselves. Initially, the time was much longer. We have no plans to change this.

Dear developers. When will a turret be able to drop ONTO the ground after being blown off by a shell explosion? When it just falls through the texture, it sort of looks bad. Many patches ago now, you said you’d enable this feature when the game was released, but now there’s no sign of it. Are there problems with it?

There are certain difficulties with this, but we still plan to implement the feature.

Will we see more Chinese tanks as premium / event / reward vehicles for the Soviet tree in the future such as Type 58 and Type 59? Or will there be a separate Chinese nation tree in the future?

It is possible that we will add other tanks of the Chinese nation in the form of promotional or premium tanks.

Will the 7.7mm (303) Browning aircraft machine gun (British and American) sound be updated? It is currently the oldest aircraft gun sound still remaining and sounds somewhat out of place compared to the others.

Work on the sounds in game is ongoing. So it is possible.

What possibility is there to see more novel but unique (such as opening cockpits that we already have) features for aircraft like Drop Tanks, Folding Wings (Naval Aircraft), RATO, Landing lights and working tail/nose wheels when taxying on the ground?

Yes there are several features we’d like to implement for aircraft. First of all - we will continue creating operating canopies, secondly we are working on animated chassis parts, thirdly - a more realistic bombsight, as for the visuals - we’d like to add exhaust stack flame.

Navy

In recent naval tests, I noticed that the rangefinder in the scope doesn’t show a distance of more than 3,000, which means you can’t fire further than that either. It feels like the shells just won’t fly farther than that – is that an intentional limitation?

The shells do fly much farther of course, it’s just that the rangefinder doesn’t provide a ballistic solution for the angle of elevation at distances greater than 3 km. This is a temporary issue that wasn’t particularly problematic for boat skirmishes with automatic cannons, but has become important on large and open maps.

General

Do you plan to divide the pilot’s hitbox (and possibly the tanker’s) into deadly and critical zones, so that when you hit them (for example in the head or torso) it would be a one-shot, but when hitting an arm or leg – it would reduce the states of the pilot\tanker? On top of that, right now killing someone by hitting them in the foot makes one think of the mythical Achilles and his heel.

We don’t have any such plans at the moment. It is to imitate this divide that tankers don’t die from any impact, but only from a threshold impact or several small ones that break the threshold together.

The War Thunder Team

Comments (195)

Commenting is no longer available for this news

Rules

Popular

*hardmanmav

3 February 2017

Please can u tell me why i purchased a Naval pack on 25th December an i still haven't got it who can sort this out cos i rang a number and it cost me alot and i still Couldn't speak to anyone

IronMuscles03

3 February 2017

French and swedish tank

KoenigTiger

3 February 2017

Will we have Tier VI->X :D

ChristianRG

3 February 2017

Having APCR < having shells that have a good amount of explosive filler. T-34-85 on average needs only one shot to kill one target, and the Comet one needs between 3 to 5 shots even with APDS to kill a single target.

zamostea86

3 February 2017

There is a problem about t55 A? Why can”t he be in this game?

Destrosator

3 February 2017

This game keeps getting even more epic. I'm really looking forward for the next big patch. Please add more vehicles and premiums! Don't listen to haters, more vehicles are always good, that's one of the main points of the game. Keep up the amazing work guys!

viperfan7

3 February 2017

Is there any chance we'll see more for night battles, and perhaps functional night gear, as there's a few tanks that do have active IR night vision

KuuH4ku

3 February 2017

leopard HESH = 145 mm Chieftain HESH = 150 mm can you change leopard HESH armor penetration to 150mm this is so unfair u know

TheFury777

3 February 2017

Leopard has a 105mm, the Chieftain has a 120mm Gun, which should have more penetration due to a larger calibre shell

lanparde

3 February 2017

Can you make the gun barrel of a tank a collision model?