- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Friends!
Ten days ago we asked you to share your key suggestions and complaints about the game in a special survey. As a result, we received 14,562 player submitted entries - many of them being very constructive. It is a very impressive number! Some submissions made a few pages of well organised bullet points. We are very grateful for such active support for the project and a desire to help us make War Thunder better!
It is very difficult to process such a great amount of information. But we managed to isolate most of the repeating points and are already working hard on them.
Economy and progression
More than 90% of feedback entries touched issues with economy and progression. The majority of them were: repair costs and the ability to pay for it by being active in battles and performing specific actions. Including rewards for assisting enemy kills, kill-to-death ratio, point capturing in a team, repair and other help to teammates plus many others. A separate layer of concern was expressed about the time needed by new players to progress all the way up to the top-tiers.
About one third of players are concerned with the current BR distribution and methods of assigning BR to a vehicle. As well as about the BR ranges of vehicles in battle.
At least 4% of players also paid special attention to such topics as the need to purchase modules, the possibility to have free - perhaps lengthy but free - repairs, and many suggestions in not modifying or significantly rebalancing premium vehicles.
All in all, we understand these concerns and will try to encompass ideas on most of them in the upcoming economy roadmap we promised to publish by June 14th.
Gameplay
About 10% of players also took time to share their ideas and observations about various gameplay issues in War Thunder. We are still assembling the full picture of those thousands of points, but have already focused in some of the most repeated ones:
Locations. Especially their size and how susceptible they are to being shot-through in Ground battles. It is a very important topic. We have tried to study our maps over a long time, creating special tools like ‘heatmaps’ of deadly shots together with the player system of likes and bans. With the game growing and many new vehicles added many maps demonstrated either new issues, or older ones became too significant.
We are already engaged in reviewing and ‘polishing’ all locations - and it is sure to be part of the upcoming game improvements.
Many of you spoke about the inconvenience of night battles. Though we already tried to make some improvements there - like lowering their appearance probability, addition of illuminating shells,- it turned out not to be enough. We will also look into new solutions here.
Some other given complaints were about aviation streaks in Arcade Ground battles, ideas how to improve voting mechanics for favourite maps, and ways to improve the survivability of stock vehicles both in ground and air battles.
The was a separate pool of ideas related to PvE modes and ways to improve their gameplay and attraction.
Naturally we received literally thousands of ideas on specific vehicle models, modules, weapons and features. It is impossible even to list them all here. Which is actually good - since War Thunder is a game about military vehicles, so it is expected they are in the focus. We are carefully studying all feedback and will try to look at it from a fresh point of view.
As mentioned, we are still in the process of analysing all of the survey entries and picking up more and more points from these worth examining and doing some extra to work on them. Currently the survey form is closed, but we will continue to make similar general broad feedback polls on the game in the future again. We will also continue to actively listen to your feedback on the forums. Our plan is to conduct such intensive ‘general questions and suggestions’ sessions at least once every 3 months.
Some of your suggestions can be put in the game quite quickly - and War Thunder game design and development teams are already working on them. Some will require a more complex approach, and we will plan for them in our roadmap. We will also cover more about these in the news for the game. So since we are planning to release a large economy and progression changes roadmap by June the 14th, we hope to meet many of your wishes on the above mentioned issues there.
By the way, we have just published a detailed Q&A for video content creators, you might find the answers interesting and relevant to some of your points in them (link).
Conclusion
Once again, thank you for taking the time and effort to share your thoughts! We have always tried to pay attention to your feedback, but getting such a massive pool of information from players all over the world - is a limitless source of inspiration and motivation for us. Do not be upset if you don’t find your exact points in the summary above - it comprises the most repetitive ideas, but we do study, and are studying them all. We will work diligently to look at issues from various viewpoints and try to improve as much as possible to allow you to continue to enjoy War Thunder for many years to come.
Comments (174)
Comments will be premoderatedAt least 4% is a nice way to say every second player. You talk to much for too little action.
Well, from the survey, it was not every second player.
"ways to improve the survivability of stock vehicles both in ground and air battles." As always, no naval mentioned, because being a sitting duck with absolutely no way to fix anything and just hope that the fire randomly goes off (not even on spawns or cap zones) is super fun and enjoyable Did you just forgot to mention it or literally no one cared?
I think my only concern is that RP gain wasn't mentioned. The SL situation is definitely rough, but RP gain for ground is a very long slog. A good match in air RB at higher tiers will not last long and give a good reward. Meanwhile you have to do amazing in a ground RB match and it has to last almost to the time limit to even get close to the same RP gain. So I find the ground grind becomes painfully slow at later tiers, and this is with a premium account and vehicle.
I've been playing since 2015. I can see the game growing (impressive). I can also see where the game is going, what it has lost over the years. I've been disappointed on many levels. Starting with forum moderation, economy, cheaters, silent nerf updates, more time-consuming and demanding events. I put a lot of my time/heart/money. At some point, I reached the limit. I don't believe ANY word of the Gaijin. Anyway, good luck. I will play, watch and also search other games whose respect all players
Another "feature" to revisit should be the impairment among players with high/low ping and/or packet loss issues versus those who can enjoy a perfect internet connection. We don't blame Gaijin for these problems, but players can do absolutely nothing to correct them, except to move and live close to servers locations, which is absurd. So maybe developers could design some sort of handicap system to compensate that, based on player connection parameters stats. Just thinking. Thanks a lot.
Taking all this with a pinch of salt
actually nice to see such feedback, and this seems like step in the right direction :) i look forward to the june 14th.
This is a very good start. More transparency in what is going on behind the scenes will only improve the trust of the playerbase, and hopefully avoid situations like this in the future. To that end, would y'all at Gaijin consider compiling a list of the sources that you use to set stats for vehicles in game?
Something I learned at a very early age (about 7 years old) was that if you let your obligations pile up before doing them, it will become overwhelming. Nowadays im a teacher and I teach that to my students. If its a lot of data, if its a lot to take in, if its a lot to process, its because YOU let it pile up. After years of gaslighting us and outright ignoring us, it is understandable that there are a lot of grievances. I have been around for 10 years and have little faith, now surprise me
new cw reward or new cw reform or new feature
CW?
Submit a complaint