- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Dear players,
We have another round of questions and answers for you, with War Thunder producer Vyacheslav Bulannikov!
Ground:
Could the IPM1 be folded with the M1 Abrams so you don't have to unlock a marginally different tank to get to the M1A1?
Maybe in the future.
Can you tell us if you are close to a Japanese SAM? Right now they remain the only nation without one which puts them at a disadvantage.
Yes, we are working on such vehicles.
Are there any plans to customize camos: wooden logs, camo nets, camouflage barrels maybe?
Sounds interesting, but petty hard to implement since we don’t have a system that would suit us in terms of quality and effort needed. We might have such a system in future though.
Good day! Is it possible in RB to keep burned tanks on the battlefield?
In a multi-respawn game, destroyed carcasses might cause different problems, for example driving through. At the moment, we keep burned carcasses of tanks for player unable to respawn in the match.
Air
With aircraft providing an increasingly more active role in Naval Forces (particularly Naval EC), is it possible we will see some more floatplanes? Some nations are without any in their standard tree and there are many famous examples of Italian and German aircraft like the Ar 196 that could be added.
Yes, we agree that in naval battles seaplanes have their niche. We plan to add similar vehicles in the future too.
It was mentioned that the implementation of modern aviation in the game is limited by the secrecy of their flight, performance characteristics and systems. Where is the “border” for it? 3rd generation, 4th or 4th+? We would like to know what the limitation is.
It is difficult to say because time goes on, documents that were closed are declassified and more information gets into free access so the limitation is gradually shifting. Simply we can say that the aviation of 3rd and partially 4th generation may well be added to the game, perhaps even newer vehicles.
Helicopters
Is it possible we could see a PvE mode for helicopters? A co-operative, objective based mode with reasonable rewards may be a good solution for the low rank helicopters who can’t counter higher rank ones in Helicopter EC. It would also provide an opportunity to explore more interesting and specific gameplay for helicopters, such as naval targets.
Recently we have added the ability to use helicopters in the tank assault mission so it is possible to research them there as well.
Would there be any possibility of adding more lower tier helicopters that do not have access to missile or rocket armaments like the AH-1G?. Instead they would be armed with guns and/or bombs, providing support from the air.
Such vehicles will have low battle efficiency. And because of this, expansion of the helicopter research trees in this way isn’t planned yet.
Navy
HMS Hawkings is outclassed by all of the other same rank heavy cruisers. She is a WW1 ship fighting mostly modernised WW2 heavy cruisers. Why was Hawkins selected?
Actually this ship is like the founder of the class of heavy cruisers and we couldn’t avoid it and of course we are already working on more advanced British ships of this type.
Is it planned to rework the “all-seeing” ship Captain’s binoculars? Or would it be even better to remove the selection using the “X” button at all? It is too simple just to press “X” several times and the ship’s captain will detect the enemy through all the bushes, trees and smoke.
There are only such targets available that are in direct visibility or that are visible to your ally. So when it seems to you that the target is not visible for you, most likely the top of its masts are above obstacles. Additionally in update 1.93 there was a bug of visibility calculation where for ships at distance beyond a threshold (more than 10 km) were not being checked for obstacles on the view line (ships that appeared at a respawn and had a visual barrier between themselves and the enemy actually have been marked as detected - a translucent marker appeared in AB - and it was possible to shoot at such targets) has been fixed. Perhaps for a purpose that isn’t fully open to view (not fully visible) we will introduce additional penalties for range detection and shooting.
Is it planned to do anything about the current sinking system? Ships don’t sink convincingly much of the time. Do you consider decreasing bilge pump efficiency?
Yes, we have some plans in this direction but so far without any details. In general, our desire coincides with yours to make the look of majestically sinking ships appear more often for the eyes of our players.
In an interview with mmorpg.com, Kirill Yudintsev announced a Saetta-class gunboat which was armed with anti-ship missiles “Nettuno” (or sea killer mk.1) on the screenshot. Can these rockets be first anti-ship missiles?
Such anti-ship missiles are possible but for its usage you will need additional control and countermeasures systems. So we can say the final word only after internal tests.
Is it possible to make sure that on a ship from the destroyer class and above it would be possible to take control over a group of the required for target main calibre turrets (for example on one side of the ship) and all other turrets remained in their original positions?
Recently we changed the aiming algorithm of the turrets from one side to another and now all the turrets attempt to hold the maximum possible number of barrels in the direction of the sight. It looks to us that this is a rather convenient implementation of multi-turret vehicle control. It is quite difficult to point out those turrets that “will not take part in the battle” because the ship usually maneuvers and turrets that can not be pointed at the target will be able to shoot at it after a small turn in the hull - such situations happen constantly.
Will there be a similar rework to bombs which was given to rockets in recent years? Specifically, as an example. AP bombs, such as the Japanese ones are not really useful and a rework may give them more of a purpose in the game.
Yes, we have such plans as well as the implementation of the mechanics of kinetic penetration of armour-piercing bombs which becomes relevant with the implementation of larger ships in the game.
The War Thunder Team
Comments (95)
helicoptere in tank assault mission is a interesting gameplay for helicopters ?... NO it's annoying and we gain very few XP ... you are unable to make a helicopter mode only interesting ...
Yeah... And many of us wats a TANK MODE ONLY... Where is the Problem??!! When our " Aces of the Sky" wants to drop a 50000 lb Bomb, than they can do it in the AF!!! Stop to destroy GF with that stupid CAS thing... Its boring..
JimPanze, Not enough people want a Tank Only mode. They've only said this a million times. It's also NOT what War Thunder is.
Is there going to a Tank Realistic Game mode that is just pure tanks?
They've only said NO to this about a dozen times. It would mess with the GF too much. Also..it's just not War Thunder. Tank Only is a boring idea.
Conte_Baracca, No it isn t .....
Will the US ever see wheeled vehicles added to their lineup like other nations? The Stryker family of IFV would be a perfect fit.
most unlikely, because that would automatically force M900, AND we can't have the Russian MBT player whining about how their already over performing armor at TOP TIER isn't working anymore.
Can we see flares or chaffs for planes? With top tier air battles now mostly dependent on the new missiles on the new mig-21 that pull 18g's, a good counter to these is neccesary.
Yes please
iirc they said somewhere that (most?) jets currently in game didnt have flares irl
Will there be any developments for the Nintendo Switch soon?
We answered this in a previous Q and A. If/When there is any news, we will be sure to share it :)
another useless Q&A
will 105mm m1s get m833 ?
i'm also want to know do m1 abrams and ipm1 get any newer round for 105mm like m830 or m900.they lack penetration against even some lower br tanks like T72A and T64.(this two tank can pen both the m1 abrams and ipm1 in the turret chicks(even last T62 can do this)because they best round have more than 440mm penetration)
fa22raptor1997, gaijin doesn't care.
Will you add flares and chaff? We really do need a counter to missiles in top tier.
None of the aircraft currently in game could mount or carry them.
Smin1080p, the Mig-21SMT was retrofit with chaff and flare dispenser later in his career , i would argue that the FGR2 should have those as well and anyway even if those weren't , why adding such a powerfull missile with no counter and not the R-13M that you removed from the Mig-19PT ?
Who the hell is asking these questions?
Now that is the million dollar question..
They are silly...You, you didn't really think it was the WT community, did you?
Yeah how about you all fix the APCR on the American T34, how about you all give the F4C its correct climb rate and missilies, how about you all fix the armor gaps in the M1A2 turret and while you're at it give the M1A2 its real turret armor.
If you have relevant source for these informations, send them to developers on the forum. Otherwise STFU. PS. Wikipedia IS NOT RELEVANT source
Submit a complaint