- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Dear players,
We have another round of questions and answers for you, with War Thunder producer Vyacheslav Bulannikov!
Mach 1-2 Jets
Is it possible the J-7II will receive any new missiles in the future such as PL-5 or PL-7? Will the MiG-21 also get any new improved missiles too?
If these missiles were historically mounted on these versions of the aircraft, then it is possible. The problem with the MiG-21 and newer missiles is that newer missiles were not put on the current version of the aircraft since these missiles require new pylons.
The MiG-21F-13 is quite restricted in its armament. Is it possible we will see later variants with more weapons?
For sure, we plan on several more versions of the MiG-21 (and we are already working on them). We understand that the current version is limited in capability but it was a widespread version that took part in different war conflicts, so we decided to start with it as, in some ways, a cult vehicle.
Now we are getting even more modern aircraft that can burn through their entire fuel loads significantly faster, the need for external fuel drop tanks has really become significant. Lots of aircraft in game would benefit from such a feature. Are there any plans for this?
Due to the reasons described above, we are not going to exclude this possibility.
France could really use a competitive top rank aircraft as the Super Mystere has suffered for some time. Is it possible we could see the French F-100 as a temporary solution before later French aircraft are ready?
The Mirage is planned for sure and it is already in the development like some other French aircraft, but we will consider this proposal.
China
Is it possible we will see a full Chinese Helicopter and Naval tree in the future?
Yes, we have plans for a Chinese helicopter research tree. This will not be such a hard task due to an already good amount of vehicles which we can choose from. Also China has their own domestic designed helicopters. With the Naval research tree, which we also have in our plans, it is an entirely opposite situation and hence, more complex.
Are any more Vietnamese or North Korean variants of vehicles as possible candidates for the Chinese tree?
We are not excluding that, but at the moment there are no details.
British Helicopters
The British helicopter tree is rather small in comparison to all other nations’ main branches, with most nations having at least 5-6 available for research in the main branch alone and Britain having only 3. Given that the Scout & Wasp are almost identical and rather low in performance/ordnance choices, do you plan to work on more British helicopters to balance out the tree numerically with other nations?
Yes, we plan to develop the British helicopter research tree in the future.
Are there any limitations behind the Westland Gazelle AH Mk 1 not being included? The British tested it with weaponry and the Westland version was capable of mounting everything that the French Aerospatiale variants even if they did not in service just like the German helicopters have American/Mexican weaponry options available to use in game. Gazelles were deployed used in the Falklands with 68mm SNEBS at least by the British. Is it possible for the future?
The main problem is that according to our information, British gazelles were armed with only 2 x 6 SNEB 68mm rocket units, which in total provides only 12 rockets. This is extremely small by the games standards, considering only volley fire is relatively effective. The other photos we have of these helicopters are contradictory, because they show ATGM suspension without control equipment. We continue to search for information and will be grateful for any help on the matter. In the meantime, we are considering other options for the British branch, for example Westland Wessex, it is noticeably different from its American ancestor and carries a variety of weapons.
Other
We have many new aircraft and helicopters with multiple loadout configurations, is it possible you will rework the loadout system to be more clear and eiffecent? Such as a modular loadout selection that allows you to see all the options more clearly?
We understand the problem and agree that aircraft with a large number of suspended weaponry presets isn’t very convenient and easy to see, so we plan to improve this system in the future.
Now that we have more modern aircraft, can you please introduce new larger and modern AI aircraft carriers with angled flight decks that can properly accommodate Jets in top tier maps? We are still operating from pre-war carriers in extremely post war aircraft now.
Yes, we have plans to design new aircraft carriers from which we can normally use post-war jets.
Since there are now premium Helicopters with air-to-air missiles, is it possible you can improve helicopter battles EC matchmaking so that people with only the first early helicopters like the AH-1G, Mi-4, H-34, Scout/Wasp and Alouette II don't have to face fully advanced air-to-air capable helicopters like Eurocopter, AH-1Z, Mi-35M and Lynx? They are almost impossible to counter with lower rank helicopters.
This is a very hard task in reality when taking into account the low popularity of purely helicopter battles. However, we are exploring possible solutions for this problem.
The War Thunder Team
Comments (214)
Wow, there is no question answered for Japs Tech again. For real I am starting to think that tech tree is abandoned.
Just you wait, I'm sure there's a new 2 engine heavy fighter coming to japan
What do you mean by abandoned? Japan recieved a new SPG last patch, and a dull navy tech tree too
When will we see the ROC flag again?
Again? It's in the decal customization area.
Ouiche, He means the ROC flags on the vehicles like the CM-11. You knew what he meant
So a lot of "planned" and a not a lot of action as per usual then. Ghost shells aren't fixed, there is a severe lack of WW2 content along with this high-tier\premium spam. The hit camera\damage text doesn't match up anymore. A lot of interaction problems between shell and armour and a ton of exploit positions on maps that you really shouldn't be able to get into\break the match. Can we please just fix this game first instead of non-stop adding new things that only breaks more. NofunAllowed
The dev team fix around ~1000 bugs between each major, they're working really hard to "fix the game" and in effect, we're having less and less bugs than before. But as old bugs are removed, it put focus on the ones remaining. As for the lack of WW2 content, we have a LOT of ww2 vehicles! Sure, we're adding modern ones often recently, but that do not erase what was done before!
Ouiche, I understand as an administrator you're running damage control but I surely hope you know as well as I do that the "1000 bugs between major patches" number doesn't mean anything without context. If it puts focus on the ones remaining those REALLY old school bugs would've been fixed years ago, they still haven't. That we still have WW2 vehicles in the game doesn't mean new ones can't be added. I am not slamming what we have, I am slamming what is being currently released. Give WW2 some love.
What about a british supersonic jet?
Stay tuned to the news ;)
lol they really do suffer
You shrunk all the maps in Rb tanks, you put tank traps every were so we can no longer explore hill tops, sniping areas etc. You introduced helicopters, anti air missile tanks. Now have rangefinder in game, it has lost its technicality. we have lost so many players because of this. For me the fun has gone out of the game. I have invested over 12,000 hours in game and over 3500 pounds helping to develop. I have lost faith. You said no premium vehicles over 6.7...
they Learnt from Blizzard in the Art of the Fun Polizia!
it's pretty ignorant of you going around beliving there wont be anny top tier premiums. as they are developing newer more modern vehicle's. they need to putt modern premium vehicle to get more players into top tier. or else the grinding gapp will be too big for working and casual players.....
What about Italy? Helicopter and naval trees has been missing for too long..Furthermore, the caproni line and post-war italian planes are still missing
We explored some vessels for the Italian Navy during the CBT phase. We showed a few of them also in full dev blogs, so they do exist indeed :) we will have more news to share on the matter in the future. But certainly the Italian Navy won't be very soon. Regarding Italian helicopters, all we can say for now is stay tuned to the news.
Smin1080p, Hello Smin, since i think it was you who stated that no bug report goes ignored, would you please care to respond here ? https://warthunder.com/en/news/6434/current/comment/81193?sort=#comments I think I might not be the only one interested in your answer. Thank you very much in advance, Jahrain.
In a previous dev blog it stated that "... soon after the release of 1.91, we plan to share the source files for the game's sound assets for mod creators..." is there any more news on this as im a sound modder and i keep getting asked when my mods are going to be updated to 1.91
Good question! It was planned to be released recently but the dev working on that project had to delay a bit due to some bugs - it's getting fixed, and *should* be released soon. (maybe next week if everything is fixed - can't guarantee a date)
Anything for Japan?
They said next Q&A.
please add helicopters to normal simulator EC mode, it would create an interesting plane/helicopter dynamic and for sure make the EC sim mode more populated. Helicopters are already flown by some AI in sim EC mode but as of yet are not playable by actual players, hoping to see this implemented soon!
That,...sounds like a bad idea...since you know, Helicopters have 18-20 G aam's
MrSeD, not really. with jets flying overhead at mach 1+, the actual exposure time is minimal. additionally, you can't just launch missiles at targets that you haven't positively identified as you are quite likely to teamkill someone. i would love for helicopters to be used in sim EC as i would then be able to actually grind some of the helicopters without having to play tank RB.
Nothing about the H U N D R E D S of comments and feedback posts surrounding BR compression & British high tier being hopelessly overtiered. Please ask the developers real questions that the people that pay your wages are worried about.
We do indeed pay attention. Yesterday we announced the introduction of BR 10.3 for ground forces which is now possible due to the current data metrics and overall population as well as available vehicle Poole. This is a significant chnsge and we will continue to monitor both feedback and data.
Submit a complaint