System Requirements
- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
Minimum
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
Recommended
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Minimum
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
Recommended
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Minimum
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
Recommended
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Developer Commentary
We invite you to watch our 'Developer's Commentary', where Kirill Yudintsev, Creative Director of Gaijin Entertainment, discusses the current status of the development of War Thunder, and shares his thoughts on the latest War Thunder Update: 1.77 "Advancing Storm"
The War Thunder Team
Read more:
Comments (177)
Since he pleaded for feedback, as far as I'm concerned, supersonic jets, top tier 90s tanks, helicopters and guided missiles are only stealing time and developing resources from the stuff I like (ww2 and 30s). As was said in the video "if you don't like it, don't play with it". Sure. Way to care about feedback, I guess. Mine is: "totally not interested".
Yeah the same way I felt when I heard it. I was like what? That totally negates the importance of the feedback. Gaijin and listening to the feedback and needs of community is a joke.
Your right that there are more vehicles in the 30s and 40s but if you add too much then the tech tree becomes a mess. We can’t just stay with the 40s forever.
Guys more respetc for the developers they work hard, making a good game it was very difficult. Great work Gaijin keep it up!
They may work hard and have honest care for the game, but its always the smaller things that destroy the outcome. Looking at the external sound fiasco and APDS meltdown (and half a dozen others, including a bug report on wrong color of over half German vehicles getting REALLY old)....... As they say, the devil is in the detail.
Jahrain, Sure because if you ever write a code you know that there isn't perfect code at first time very often has bugs and other smaller things maybe in a small code just in a few lines.
my feedback would be create a poll that ask 2000 experienced players that want to volentarily give their feedback on the questions you give us. no players that just started and already have "fixes" i get that the loudest voice is gonna get listened to but also consider how long they've played. after giving those 2000 people questions such as "what could we do to approve tanks/planes" "how do we get more people to play and play longer" dont be scared to ask the community! we wanna help! we care!!
listen to this guy. and listen to the experienced players who reached top lvl everywhere.. your new players will soon reach such stage.. and what then??
3 weeks past release date of 1.77 and linux client still hasnt had a single fix. performance droped by 50% and all around there is a big shadow preventing gameplay. And not a single response to linux/mac community qustions. Good work gaijin. People will support you with money like you respect them
As we say in the video, the developers are working on performance issues and optimization. We're aware of problems for some players and do have (potential) solution in the pipeline. Unfortunately, some corrections take time :'(
You've copy/pasted this comment in the past 5 posts... I understand you're mad but relax.
We appreciate this feedback very much from your developers! Maybe we could have more of things like these videos/Developer Q&A in the future so we can stay updated on what Gaijin is doing and provide more relevant and constructive feedback?
IF Helicopters make it into ground forces I'm quiting... BUT... I may stay for air battles if supersonic is sometime this year ;D
You can go supersonic with some planes for some time already! (ok, without wings and heading to the ground)
I think you will change your mind when they are added.. remember that helicopters are easy to shoot down, even for tanks.
We dont change our stats for vehicles.... *Looks at KPz/MBT 10s reload* Sure you dont Gaijin
Side Note, any news on the APFSDS for the Leo2k getting proper performance? It was shown on the forums you accepted it was underperforming by quite a dozen millimeters
Sabian49, underperforming? are you kidding? Leo2k is just flat out sealclubbing high tier unless someone gets a lucky hit on it.
So... bla bla bla... we are so happy to get feedback from you players... so what do you do when we give feedback? You erase the post at the correct forum and do... nothing... I have made a report on bug regarding new gunpods for F8F-B1 because there is no option to choose the ammo as B1 model has cannons... not only did I not get any feedback on my feedback.. my post was deleted (not approved to get into the forum). And the bug is ofcourse still there... amateurs or noncares? WHATEVER... bla bla
no MiG-19!! o-o (at least anytime soon right?) All that sounds great hope it all goes as planned and one thing I would like to add. Since you are adding higher ranking vehicles new players who have been attracted to your game by seeing an abrams or t64b will have to grind really hard for it, will there be a change for this, such as making new players skip a few ranks to get to higher ranking tanks, like closer to abrams for example? And future modern tanks that are higher in the tree?
thats called getting a high tier premium and grinding fast with premium or buying ge to fast research things. It's a free to play game, they want you to spend either a lot of money on it or a lot of time
"As you know, we don't invent new vehicles or change the stats of existing ones" ))))
*stares at the KPz-70's reload being the same as MBT-70's reload, despite the fact that the Germans left the project before it was changed to 10 seconds*
TheReaper501, Just go and look at the Changelog for the past year... ))))