- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
Greetings, commanders! Today we would like to shed some light on the Naval battles development process and to tell you about the problems we have faced and how we have solved them. We would also like to share our plans for the future in Naval development.
From the very beginning of War Thunder naval battles development we understood that it wouldn’t be easy since our game format is maximum realism on the one hand, and a dynamic game experience with short game sessions on the other. We also took into consideration that implementing different vehicle types in one battle is complicated when we are talking about naval battles, that is why the mosquito fleet was a logical decision. Battles involving these vessels were both dynamic and interesting.
The playtests we ran with your participation helped us a lot to identify the downsides of the gameplay as well as identifying a variety of bugs and errors, so we had to correct our plans. After analyzing your feedback we decided to focus on improvement in the gameplay and temporarily not to introduce new craft in the playtests until we had completed much of the improvements and tweaking.
As a result of the tests, we decided to implement specific improvements, tweak some mechanics or even sometimes completely rework the following.
Gun stabilization to compensate for sea motion
We took the decision to model the rocking effects on naval forces, as without them, the vessels would become “tanks on blue grass”. Additionally, in real combat craft there were various and multiple systems to compensate for any rocking during firing, including three-dimensional compensation. We did our best to model and simulate manual and automatic gun stabilization for War Thunder naval forces, in order to make them effective at striking any enemy affected by sea swell and rocking.
Damage system
We improved the damage system for War Thunder naval forces: even small patrol boats can contain multiple systems, for example, up to 10-20 firing points. This variety and complexity makes targeting the exact component on enemy vessel almost impossible due to the small comparative size of these items. This is why we organized components into groups, that could be targeted and damaged, and would be visible in the hit camera. Also, we decided to distance our naval forces from the logic we use in the ground force battles, that is a craft is counted as destroyed when you have lost your last crew member. In larger and even huge naval crews there are numerous issues that were pointed out by our players, when you had to find and knock out the very last sailor of the enemy vessel. In our new damage model when you disable one of the enemy compartments, you also disable part of the total crew, specifically the crew assigned to this compartment.
Controlling fire from guns of different calibres and purpose
The multiple types of fire units using different calibres complicates reasonable aiming and fire correction, it also forces a player to focus all his fire on a single target. This is why we plan to divide different purpose weaponry to different groups, and a player will be able to choose which ones he will control himself and which ones will be controlled automatically, taking players commands into account.
New vessel survivability mechanics
Repairs, fire extinguishing and reducing or stopping flooding: we plan to add more gameplay to these important actions rather than use the existing fully automatic process.
Smoke screens
Smaller vessels usually do not have serious armour protection that is why smoke screens play a vital role in increasing a craft’s survivability and more diverse gameplay. We already demonstrated the smokescreen mechanics during the April Fool’s event this year and we are working to integrate them into naval gameplay.
Other features
We also plan to change the torpedo aim logic and add lead indication.
As for the visuals we have added procedural destruction of the vessels - it is in the final testing stage at the moment. We also continuously improve the visuals of the craft, water and the environment.
Besides general gameplay improvement all these changes will let us add larger ships to the game.
And now some numbers - what has already been done and what you will be able to see in the nearest future.
At the moment we have the following things either ready or in development:
- Over 70 vessels of various classes from different nations are completely ready and around 20 more craft are currently in development.
- 10 locations (both the one we have already shown and ones in development).
- Gun stabilization systems.
- Traversing torpedo tubes.
- Procedural destruction of vessels.
- New Damage Model mechanics.
- Torpedo gyro correction.
Comments (133)
I wish they would finally give us 64 player battles, with ground air and navy on same map. also move it to world war mode for squadrons to fight over territory on them. Give us ~40 minute battles were we can use tactics. Leave normal MM for the instant gratification bunch that want 5minute battles
Does this mean that naval testing will be postponed until further notice?
One solid suggestion would be to utilize larger open maps at dusk/night to simulate real PT/MTB battles. What you have right now is WoWS arcade style play which instantly turns many players off completely. Use some of your Pacific air battle maps for RB testing and you will start to get better reactions to your testing. Those itty bitty little arcade maps can go in the trash because they are WoWS garbage. No offence to the designers but they are bad. This isn't what you want to hear, but...
Just throwing it out there..there's literally no excuse for anyone not to go and learn how to model and implement your work in CDK. If you see something you want to have developed, then learn how to model it and model it. Having a working model will probably have a much greater influence in having things added. For example, if a large number of community members accurately modeled a navy of cruisers/battleships and had a thread pinned for their work to be seen, that shows TRUE dedication/desire.
it would be pretty neat if you added high tier German jets because right now there really bad german jets mixed with some real american, russian jets.
"that is why the mosquito fleet was a logical decision. Battles involving these vessels were both dynamic and interesting." Ahahahha- no. They are boring and repetitive, and the majority of your playerbase is utterly disapointed with this.
It is called Pre-CBT Tests for a reason.... consider this stage as an Alpha Test
You guys should add a like button to your devblogs ;) How else shoud I express my feelings? GREAT DEV TEAM!!
I was thinking that I already paid for some of the ships that you could at the very least let me have them in my port. So I can start working on the skin.
"...with short game sessions". For me, that's one of WarThunder's problems. The Matches are way TOO short. The fights I remember a few days after aren't the short ones. The long ones are the epic battles.
The problem is there are a bunch of players with the attention spans of a fruit fly on acid. It seems that most of them are native to the motherland so their desires are taken first. That isn't to say that there aren't players from other nations exactly like them.
So I had a comment telling why ships are and can't be done in small boats in War Thunder. i had some videos linked and I'm guessing Pacific Removed them. So just go find the Phly Rant on Boats and Mikegoesboom Rant on why small boats don't belong in this game. Apparently I can't link anything..
My grammar is terrible.
Submit a complaint