- For PC
- For MAC
- For Linux
- OS: Windows 7 SP1/8/10 (64 bit)
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.2 GHz
- Memory: 4GB
- Video Card: DirectX 10.1 level video card: AMD Radeon 77XX / NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660. The minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Windows 10/11 (64 bit)
- Processor: Intel Core i5 or Ryzen 5 3600 and better
- Memory: 16 GB and more
- Video Card: DirectX 11 level video card or higher and drivers: Nvidia GeForce 1060 and higher, Radeon RX 570 and higher
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i5, minimum 2.2GHz (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 6 GB
- Video Card: Intel Iris Pro 5200 (Mac), or analog from AMD/Nvidia for Mac. Minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Mac OS Big Sur 11.0 or newer
- Processor: Core i7 (Intel Xeon is not supported)
- Memory: 8 GB
- Video Card: Radeon Vega II or higher with Metal support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
- OS: Most modern 64bit Linux distributions
- Processor: Dual-Core 2.4 GHz
- Memory: 4 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 660 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months; the minimum supported resolution for the game is 720p) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 17 GB
- OS: Ubuntu 20.04 64bit
- Processor: Intel Core i7
- Memory: 16 GB
- Video Card: NVIDIA 1060 with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) / similar AMD (Radeon RX 570) with latest proprietary drivers (not older than 6 months) with Vulkan support.
- Network: Broadband Internet connection
- Hard Drive: 95 GB
 |
Friends, we were interested to know what you thought about the update and what you were waiting for most and now we want to share with you the results of this survey!
Most anticipated in the update was weapon stabilization for ground vehicles and exhaust flames for aircraft. A lot of players were looking forward to new locations and vehicles and of course gave their votes for these points.
We also received a lot of interesting ideas, thank you for this!
Out of these ideas we found - update description, including a video format and which media player would make it possible to view it in the game directly. And for sure for news about the development of the Naval Forces!
Thank you for your suggestions, we reviewed them and will try to take them into the account in the future.
The War Thunder Team
Comments (170)
As Gaijin states on the Wiki "WT is dedicated to WW-II military", you should make a "Historical Player" mode, where the historical battlefield is the filter for which tanks to participate in the battle. By making the historical battlefield the controlling factor, you can avoid the BR as a disruptive element to provide different nations and tanks special advantages - and at the same time the historical scales be guided by facts and facts only. Fictive tanks like IS-6 and RU-251 is not WW-II.
Have you planned to introduce a REAL history player mode, where the historical battlefields are the controlling part for, which tanks and planes that can participate in the battles as a standard mode for daily battles?
This way you can avoid the BR as a confusion part to give some nations and tanks/planes special advantages. As both the RU-251 and IS-6 are both fictive tanks, that never went to manufacturing, the historical dimension and the dedication to WW-II weapons in WT is deviating from all historical facts. Please make a historical player mode as standard and not as a special event.
Are War Thunder still "dedicated to WW-II military" or has the historical dimension in the company policy changed?
Would be nice to have Smoke for ground forces, also be able to destroy the launched ATGMs by shooting on them with heavy MGs or cannons!
I love the new bomb view. I forgot to put that when I submitted the survey
Bomb viewer? Enlighten me, please!
The_Bearjew, when you hold U to look after the bomb you just drop, you can turn now the camera
Umm...this is for the people who have access to naval battles, so, when is it going to be an official "section" of the game and not just for certain people? Also will you guys add the B-52?
Naval isnt even in CBT yet
B-52 wouldn't work with the game,adn the B-36 is still a far stretch. The YB-36 could be added though
so i was going top speed in an strv and the gun DID NTO MOVE meaning i could fire on the move with a very high degree of effectiveness, and the sherman doesent seem to have changed that much...even though they had stabalizers...im also having mixed feeling s about the m8 scott, the heat ammo isnt quite working...by that i mean it seems to not do much...evne a sucsessfull hit where a weakness is (crew or ammo, modules even) half the tanks just shrug it off like nothing
The stabilizers on the Shermans seem only to work at speeds at or lower than 18km/h.
Y3_SkyBreaker, 15km/h at least for all versions before the A3 (Don't ahve access to that, so can't say for sure on that one)
Thanks for this survey. You need to do many more of these!
Any news on Ground PVE?
Soon™ :)
and what i would like to see is on a BIG rivermap the possibility to shoot at a riverboat with tanks or airplane , so some maps need higher bridges etc. and to CAP an base area expanding for a small part into a river with a boat or on the bridge with a vehicle or landing on the road with a plane?.
Please lodge a Suggestion here > https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/forum/611-suggestions/
Submit a complaint