Client stability has been improved. I have seen this in almost every update. what in the world does it really do.

Just coming back after a very long hiatus, and I was wondering if there was any reason you don't mix it up with the acronyms in the videos? Like: using "WW 1" in one place, but "How would a tank made for World War One fare in World War 2" in another, or "You won't get there fast with a maximum speed of 35kph, but in reality, you won't go faster than 20 kilometers per hour." I've noticed the odd repetition of acronyms in a few videos now...

still just want to see the Se-580 heavy fighter in the french tier 4.

There is a type,at the end of the last line it says Vaffenträger instead of Waffenträger!

I had to laugh at the pun on "historical accuracy" at the end. Great episode!

will we ever be able to drive the BA-10?

So no Buccaneer because it has no guns yet the Vautour IIA is OK? Lol

"What can six “Hurritons” do with a regiment of Junkers-87s covered by the Gustavs? A story of an unbelievable fight!" and the "funny joke" was?, shot down pilots with accents?... not that amusing tbh

When will we see more native French heavy fighters and attackers? Right now almost an entire branch of the French tree is reskins instead of French designs.

Will we ever see the most common Fw190 built during 1944-45, The Fw-190A8/R2 (deletion of 13.2mm, outer 20s replaced with Mk108 30mm)? I know it didnt serve on the Eastern Front, with the exception of as a Jabo in the final weeks of the war, but a few episodes back, someone commented on the inaccuracy of the weapons loadout in game. You're response was along the lines of "provide historical documentation, and we'll see what we can do". At the very least, the USA 190 definitely had this armament.